Punitive Damages Florida

FREE Consultation

Contact Us Today For A Free 1-Hour Personal Injury Case Evaluation

No Fee Unless You Win!

So, what is the definition of punitive damages in Florida?

Let’s start with a famous example. Hulk Hogan made pretty big news with his verdict against Gawker Media in 2016.

If you remember, a jury awarded the Hulkster $117 million in compensatory damages. These were damages for the Hulk’s pain and suffering. For him.

But the jury really thought Gawker was a pile of scum. So, the jury decided to penalize Gawker and awarded the Hulkster an additional $40 million in punitive damages!

Now, let’s discuss punitive damages in Florida car accident cases and how your car accident attorney can help you.

What Types of Auto Accident Cases May Lead to Punitive Damages In Florida?

If someone has died and the driver may be charged with manslaughter.

The driver behaved in a reckless, reprehensible, or otherwise terrible way.

The driver was drunk (at or above a .08% Blood Alcohol Content or BAC).

The driver operated his or her vehicle at a high rate of speed and recklessly caused the automobile accident.

The driver was committing a crime and fleeing and caused a car accident.

The driver knowingly did not maintain his or her vehicle in a safe manner (i.e. bad brakes).

The company that owns the vehicle knowingly did not maintain the vehicle in a safe manner (i.e. bad brakes).

The company that owns the vehicle knowingly hired an individual who should not be driving a vehicle and could cause accidents or other bad things to happen.

Punitive damages are generally awarded to a party who has been injured by acts committed recklessly, willfully, and maliciously. Punitive damages generally require something more than simple negligence.

The function of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer, as opposed to compensating the victim. The hope is that that the financial consequences will deter the wrongdoer and others from committing such acts in the future.

In recent years, courts and juries have been more willing to issue large punitive verdicts to punish wrongdoers, especially big corporations. However, lawmakers, who tend to receive important financial contributions from these same big corporations, are constantly passing laws to limit punitive awards.

Intentional Torts and Malice

If an injured party is hurt because of an intentional tort (i.e. assault), then punitive damages may be appropriate. In fact, if “malice” is an element of the intentional tort, then punitive damages will be at issue in the case.

Unintentional Wrongs

Simple or gross negligence is not enough to justify an award of punitive damages. This is because punitive damages are to punish and deter a wrongdoer. If the wrongdoer simply acted negligently (i.e. rear-ending someone else’s car), that act was not terrible enough to merit an award for punitive damages.

Who Decides the Amount of Punitive Damages in Florida?

Punitive damages in Florida is a matter for a jury to decide. The burden is on the plaintiff (the victim) to establish his or her entitlement to a punitive award by clear and convincing evidence. The weight of such evidence will determine the amount of any award.

The jury is then charged with the task of determining an award amount that is an appropriate degree of punishment for the reckless and malicious conduct of the defendant (the wrongdoer).

Evidence Considered by the Jury

The plaintiff can utilize the discovery process to find out the defendant’s financial situation. Documents available include tax returns, financial statements, income, cash flow, expenses, anticipated income, bank accounts, ownership of property and its value, and more. Attorneys can go back three to five years in the discovery process to assess the wrongdoer’s financial situation and determine the appropriate amount of punitive damages for which to ask the jury.

Tort Reform and Limits on Punitive Damages

Starting in 1999, “tort reform” in Florida capped the amount of punitive damages in the following ways:

If the defendant had specific intent to harm the plaintiff, then there is no cap (in other words, tort reform does not apply).
If specific intent to cause harm cannot be determined, then the cap may not exceed the greater of three times the amount of compensatory damages or $500,000.
If the jury finds the defendant acted wrongfully only for financial gain and the defendant or the defendant’s managing agent, director, officer, or other representatives likely knew the possibility of causing injury, then the amount of punitive damages may not exceed four times the amount of compensatory damages or $2 million (whichever amount is higher).

The Intoxicated Defendant and Punitive Damages in Florida

These caps on punitive damages do not apply if the defendant was intoxicated at the time of the act for which punitive damages are sought. A defendant was legally intoxicated if he or she was under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance to the extent that his or her normal faculties were impaired or he or she had a blood or breath alcohol level of .08% or higher.

Pleading and Practice

The plaintiff in Florida needs to first file his or her lawsuit seeking compensatory damages. Then, after gathering enough evidence to show a reasonable basis for the recovery of punitive damages, proffer (or offer) testimony and file a pleading seeking punitive damages.

In other words, punitive damages are usually requested later in the game. Once sufficient evidence is gathered and shown to the court, the plaintiff can then move to amend his or her complaint.

If the plaintiff files a request for punitive damages too early in the case, the other side’s defense attorney will move to dismiss the complaint or move for the court to issue a protective order to limit financial discovery.

Punitive Damages Against the State of Florida or Other State Entities

Florida law prohibits actions for punitive damages against the State of Florida or its entities. However, if a State employee caused damages while acting in bad faith, punitive damages can be sought against him or her individually.

Punitive Damages and Corporations

A corporation can be held liable for the direct conduct of its managing agent, a managing officer, or the primary owner of the corporation.

Vicarious Liability: An Employer Can be Held Liable for an Employee

A case for punitive damages against a corporation is valid when an employee’s actions rise to the level of “intentional misconduct” or “gross negligence.”

Gross negligence means the defendant’s conduct was so reckless that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to someone life, safety, or rights.

In Florida, the employer must have also actively and knowingly participated in the grossly negligent conduct, or condoned and ratified the conduct, or engaged in conduct that contributed to the loss, damages, or injury suffered by the claimant.

Tampa Personal Injury Services

See Settlement Results!

Client Testimonials

Christine E.
Christine E.
19:36 05 Dec 19
This past Tuesday, I got into a car accident that was frankly, quite scary. The experience left me disoriented, shaken, and overwhelmed with what "next steps" needed to be taken. Thanks to Nicole Pearlman, and the whole Denmon & Pearlman team, I didn't have to worry about those next steps. They quickly took over and set me up with medical appointments, a rental car, car inspection.... leaving me the ability to focus on spending those initial hours processing the accident and later, days spent on healing physically and emotionally. In a world where billions of people reside and yet we still often feel alone, that was never the case during this chaotic week. Never did I once feel alone in this whole process and I am incredibly thankful for their kindness to my nephew and I and their expertise in these matters. Denmon & Pearlman, especially Nicole Pearlman, WILL be there for you during life's most challenging experiences.
Nichole P.
Nichole P.
14:37 18 Apr 19
Ashley Boisvert was so great to work with when it comes to dealing with a not so great situation! I highly recommend Denmon & Pearlman.
John A.
John A.
16:50 20 Mar 19
I had to resolve an issue with real estate created by my divorce lawyer’s mistake. We interviewed 4 other attorneys who were non commital about what they could do, a couple said I should pay off my ex to resolve.Paul Knudsen in the New Port Richey office looked at the case and felt we had a valid case and was confident he could help. He did just that ! Resolved the situation AND got half of my legal fees from my ex. He’s very smart and well respected in the courts. Definitely has our highest recommendation!!
Carly M.
Carly M.
13:47 01 May 18
Nicole Denmon handled my criminal defense case and her tenacity at getting the desired result exceeded far beyond what I ever thought to hope for. Even after I had given up, Nicole persisted in negotiating my case until she was able to get the ideal outcome for me. I have never had an attorney fight for me the way that Nicole did, and weeks later I am still amazed at the perseverance and level of dedication shown by Nicole and her supporting staff. Thank you Nicole!
Josh F.
Josh F.
16:12 09 Jun 17
Great group of attorneys. They are very knowledgable and quick. I got responses to my questions immediately and they actually seem to care about their clients. I would highly recommend them.
Next Reviews

2 Week No obligation Guarantee

Work with us for 2 weeks. If you want to leave and work with another attorney or law firm we will refund your money.
No questions back.